Interesting to see the differences in perspective in these two explanations of the Harlem Shake craze. The Fader offers specific background from the vantage point of an almost interested party, with loose connections to the music and the The Root, more removed, is able to provide a more poignant cultural interpretation. I take minor issue with both as one exudes an underlying sense of desperation for credit, as marketers and wannabe monetizers tend to do, and the latter seems to miss the almost accidental nature of the terminology in play and also, I think, unnecessarily takes a negative view of the exposure. I think there is an argument to be made that the multiple large audiences will actually lead to more discussion and more discovery of the real Harlem Shake dance, albeit with contributions from critical parties, such as Tamara Palmer. By the way, there are some vdos where heads are at least trying to do it correctly, like this one from fake Obama.
Leave a Response
- samsung brightside battery said: "It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS......" on The Universal Federation for the Preservation of Hip Hop Culture / seen
- Fiancee Visa Requirements said: "Its a very nice post which contain an interesting video as well...." on Big Baby Gandhi – Green Card
- true religion corduroy said: "Great post...." on Swagg and JoJo – Have It All / vdo
the corp. takeover
It's A Demo!