“Why ‘Lord Finesse Vs. Mac Miller’ May Be More Important Than You Think”
g
@ 7:04 am
Jul 12, 2012
Leave a Response
singles
standouts
vdos
events
Queens!
recently
say word
- Terry said: "I have had a rush card many times in the past. I recently moved and did not receive my replacement rush card that I had ordered. I called customer service and tried to......" on The Rush Card’s Embarrassingly See Through Attempt To Steal Your Money – Dissected By The NYTimes
- g said: "Mike heron?..." on Black Attack – Correct Technique ft. Problemz
- lou said: "classic 90′s joint..did Spinna produced this?..." on Black Attack – Correct Technique ft. Problemz
mixtapes
the corp. takeover
re(tro)spect
GDtv
It's A Demo!
Q.E.P.D.
[...] Spotted: GrandGood [...]
I think your point was clarified at the end, where you used the Pete Rock vs Lupe argument for perspective. The issue doesn’t seem that it’s the sample, and I think you say that in a roundabout way.
The issue is that Mac seems to have rhymed over Lord Finesse’s instrumental. He didn’t just sample the original recording, as Lupe did, which has happened 8 billion times in hip hop. Many artists/producers make a sample famous, even though later productions using the sample sound totally different (think Jay-Z Show Me What You Got vs Rump Shaker). I think Pete’s issue was that I made this sample famous, go dig for your own samples. I can’t recall anyone else using the Dionne Warwick track that Dila used for “Stop” on Donuts, but afterwards, I heard it on two or three beats.
Lord Finesse’s issue is, I made this entire beat…chopped it up, tracked it, and everything, and you came along and used it. I want compensation for all that time and effort. I’m not a big proponent of suing someone over mixtape tracks, but I came up in an era where the mixtape wasn’t used as it is today; they’re basically albums now. He’s probably got a point with this.